Wednesday, December 9, 2015

the Power of Proper Argumentation

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b2/ab/99/b2ab9975dd4e4c9910b6e5ab1b036afd.jpg

Argumentation and debate are tools of persuasion. More than that, they are powerful artwork expressed with words, sculpted with logic, and painted with passion. Good argumentation is an effective tool that can help on the journey towards progress. It will drive others to think, to ponder, to challenge their own thoughts. It will remain respectful while responding powerfully, ever ready to discover truth. When abused, it becomes an ugly and warped picture, a dissonant song. Whether embraced or abused, argumentation is a vital part of life and must be studied, mastered, and shared for the betterment of us all.  

The Power of Visual Argumentation


http://www.webdesignbooth.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/fedex-advertisement.jpg

Visuals in argumentation and persuasion are extremely effective. For example, this advertisement for FedEx is making the claim that FedEx will deliver the product to you in the same condition that it was sent. The use of a vase is particularly effective because vases are noticeably fragile and easily broken if mishandled.

An Appeal to Santa


http://megjohnsonspeaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Calvin-Hobbes-Comic-Strips-calvin-and-hobbes-27569856-500-160.gif

Here Calvin is arguing using the false cause approach. He is attributing his bad behavior to a bad environment and "mitigating circumstances" though that is clearly not true. He's a pretty funny kid though!

San Bernardino and Policy Claims


http://cdn.sandiegouniontrib.com/img/photos/2012/07/12/bce9f9b7-7b2e-4692-9291-1c462c45fbeenews.ap.org_r900x493.jpg?122770e84b36f1c039d5c4c2ca15c2d8bc4ecd52


Transcript of President's address regarding San Bernardino:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/06/politics/transcript-obama-san-bernardino-isis-address/

Following the tragic terrorist attack on San Bernardino, California, President Obama issued this statement. His words demonstrate an important part of argumentation - the policy claim. Here is his policy claim:

"Here's how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, airstrikes are taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers, infrastructure. And since the attacks in Paris, our closest allies -- including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom -- have ramped up their contributions to our military campaign, which will help us accelerate our effort to destroy ISIL. Second, we will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of thousands of Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so that we take away their safe havens. In both countries, we're deploying Special Operations Forces who can accelerate that offensive. We've stepped up this effort since the attacks in Paris, and we'll continue to invest more in approaches that are working on the ground.
Third, we're working with friends and allies to stop ISIL's operations -- to disrupt plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them from recruiting more fighters. Since the attacks in Paris, we've surged intelligence-sharing with our European allies. We're working with Turkey to seal its border with Syria. And we are cooperating with Muslim-majority countries -- and with our Muslim communities here at home -- to counter the vicious ideology that ISIL promotes online.
Fourth, with American leadership, the international community has begun to establish a process -- and timeline -- to pursue ceasefires and a political resolution to the Syrian war. Doing so will allow the Syrian people and every country, including our allies, but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal of destroying ISIL -- a group that threatens us all.
This is our strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by our military commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65 countries that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly examine our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to get the job done. That's why I've ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review the visa (waiver) program under which the female terrorist in San Bernardino originally came to this country. And that's why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.
Now, here at home, we have to work together to address the challenge. There are several steps that Congress should take right away.
To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.
We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject any gun safety measures. But the fact is that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies -- no matter how effective they are -- cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual is motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology. What we can do -- and must do -- is make it harder for them to kill.
Next, we should put in place stronger screening for those who come to America without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether they've traveled to warzones. And we're working with members of both parties in Congress to do exactly that.
Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against these terrorists. For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of airstrikes against ISIL targets. I think it's time for Congress to vote to demonstrate that the American people are united, and committed, to this fight.
My fellow Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the terrorist threat." 
In this part of his speech, the President calls for a very specific course of action in response to the horrible attack. 

Finals............


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/52/44/12/5244127bd1ca02b0bd30a8f8db96875a.jpg

The Argument every College Student wants to make this week.

The Effectiveness of One-Liner Rebuttals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmYsH4reZek

This clip from "Boy Meets World" demonstrates the effectiveness of clever rebuttals. Though Mr. Turner (younger teacher) does not follow the proper rebuttal protocol, he certainly provides an answer for everything Mr. Feeny says. It is quite hilarious. Enjoy. 

Frustrations and Generalizations

http://www.iran-daily.com/File/File/136640


READ THIS: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/07/politics/donald-trump-muslim-ban-immigration/

This article reports of Donald Trump's latest publicity stunt. He makes me very frustrated. His recent comments regarding banning all Muslims is ridiculous, unAmerican, and cruel. It is a fallacious argument in which he generalizes a whole group of people based on the actions of a select few. There are many Muslims who are American and love this country. Similarly, there are many Muslims who seek to enter this country because they value the freedoms and safety that we offer. Trump's ridiculous proposal completely opposes all the values on which America stands. I cannot believe he is a front-runner.